In the case of gasoline financial system, there is a debate about engine dimension vs. engine pace. Is it higher to have an even bigger engine turning low RPMs or a small engine revving its coronary heart out? Lately, the Rubbish Time YouTube channel tried to reply that age-old gasoline consumption query whereas attempting to devour 10 minutes of your time.
The video includes a 1996 Ford Falcon and a 1991 FSM Niki, a revised model of the Fiat 126 offered in Australia from 1989 to 1992. With the air-con on, the Falcon burns 15.7 liters of gasoline each 100 kilometers, the equal of about 15 mpg. As for the Niki, it does not have air-con. We’re additionally not likely certain what sort of gasoline mileage it will get as a result of it retains breaking down. However with a tiny 650cc two-cylinder engine and a 1,300 lb curb weight, the Niki ought to thrash the Falcon in a battle of the least. If it stays operating.
The race is easy, drive 100 km over a mix of roads whereas maintaining with visitors. The Falcon cruises serenely, barely cracking 1,800 rpm. It by no means breaks a sweat, even on the freeway, simply maintaining with visitors.
In response to Rubbish Time, driving the Niki flat out is like being in a “caged bike” or a “wheelbarrow for people.” Removed from highly effective, its two-cylinder engine thrashes simply to keep up pace on the freeway, struggling valiantly to succeed in the pace restrict, earlier than settling again to 80 km/h (50 mph).
Finally the race ends, and the gasoline financial system scores are tallied. The Falcon manages a good 10.77 liters per 100 km or virtually 22 mpg. Operating flat out more often than not, the Niki burned 5.6 liters per 100 km, the equal of 42 mpg.
As for who actually wins, it could come all the way down to your choice. Would you quite spend extra on gasoline to get someplace comfortably? Or, are you the form of one that goes the most affordable route doable or enjoys the feeling of driving a gradual automobile quick?